German born theoretical physicist, Albert Einstein,
once said, “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex and more
violent. It takes a touch of genius, and a lot more courage, to move in the
opposite direction” however when it comes to regulating our errant bankers
or taking them to task for their crimes, it appears genius and courage are not
to be called on. I am certain it is because of this that my dealings with the Financial Ombudsman Service continue to make little progress.
Following a full review of my file, a process which
took a further three weeks, I am now told,
·
The FOS do not accept they are guilty of
giving an unresponsive HBOS countless opportunities to discard my case on
jurisdiction grounds whilst simultaneously hounding me for instant replies in
order to be “fair to the business”.
·
The FOS do not accept they are guilty of
unnecessarily asking me to collate my case in detail, despite declining it on
grounds of jurisdiction after weeks of preparatory work, nineteen months later
·
The FOS do not accept they are guilty of
favouring HBOS despite a period of nine months with no progress from the time I lodged my over-valuation
complaint
However, in
complete contrast to the tone of the majority of their letter I am also told,
·
The FOS sincerely apologise for their
lack of diligence with regard to securing an HBOS response to my over valuation
complaint.
Mildly encouraged by this minor step forward yet resigned to the inevitability of endless waiting, I can only conclude the FOS's lack of impetus in this instance is not merely oversight due to unprecedented levels of complaints but is instead an endemic reluctance to tackle the UK's bankers and an clear indication of their discomfort at the prospect of unearthing another bankster miss-selling (or rather sub-prime overselling) scandal. For this reason it is no surprise to hear,
Mildly encouraged by this minor step forward yet resigned to the inevitability of endless waiting, I can only conclude the FOS's lack of impetus in this instance is not merely oversight due to unprecedented levels of complaints but is instead an endemic reluctance to tackle the UK's bankers and an clear indication of their discomfort at the prospect of unearthing another bankster miss-selling (or rather sub-prime overselling) scandal. For this reason it is no surprise to hear,
- Royal Bank of Scotland feel justified in their lobbying for legislative changes to enable them to repossess properties with distressed mortgages more quickly
- The FSA are happy to risk more subrime selling by formally relaxing capital and liquidity rules for UK banks
- While Martin Wheatley believes widespread miss-selling is a far cry from theft
With mounting evidence to suggest economic reform, financial
regulation and banking prosecutions will amount to nothing more substantial
than an after dinner speech, it seems the new chairman of the British Bankers Association, Sir Nigel Wicks, is correct in saying “we must all take personal responsibility for
the restoration of trust in banking”. His words could not ring truer now that
it is abundantly clear the restoration of trust in our bankers is to have
nothing to do with the genius of our regulators and has even less to do with the
courage of our Financial Ombudsman Service.
Albert Einstein also said, “Weakness of attitude becomes
weakness of character” and I suspect this is precisely what errant bankers
are counting on to escape prosecution for their crimes. I hasten to add weakness of attitude and weakness of
character is not what the Halifax Bank of Scotland or the Financial Ombudsman Service can expect to encounter in their dealings with me.
No comments:
Post a Comment